> On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 08:47:25 -0400, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>
> > m/.../Count,Insensitive (instead of m/.../ti)
> >
> >That would escape the problem that we are running out of letters and
> >also the problem that the current letters are hard to remember.
>
> Yes, but wouldn't this give us backward compatibility problems? For
> example, code like
>
> $result = m/(.)/Insensitive, ord $1;
No, because that is presently a syntax error. The one you have to
watch out for is:
$result = m/(.)/s,Insensitive, ord $1;
> And, I don't really see the need for the comma.
>
> m/.../CountInsensitive (instead of m/.../ti)
I guess, but to me CountInsensitive looks like one option, not two.
