Re: Overlapping RFCs 135 138 164

[Nathan Wiger]

Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
> 
> RFC135: Require explicit m on matches, even with ?? and // as delimiters.

This one is along a different line from these two:

> RFC138: Eliminate =~ operator.
 
> RFC164: Replace =~, !~, m//, and s/// with match() and subst()

Which I could see unifying. I'd ask people to wait until v2 of RFC 164
comes up. It may well include everything from RFC 138 already.

-Nate