>I am working on an RFC
>to allow boolean logic ( && and || and !) to apply a number of patterns to
>the same substring to allow easier mining of information out of such
>constructs.
What, you don't like: :-)
$pattern = $conjunction eq "AND"
? join('' => map { "(?=.*$_)" } @patterns)
| join("|" => @patterns);
--tom
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Buddha Buck
- XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operato... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... David Corbin
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Richard Proctor
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Michael Maraist
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Bart Lateur
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... David L. Nicol
