> > 2. Many people - including Larry - have voiced their desire
> > to see =~ die a horrible death
>
> Please provide a look-up-able reference to Larry's saying that he
> wanted to =~ to die horrible death.
Larry said:
# Well, the fact is, I've been thinking about possible ways to get rid
# of =~ for some time now, so I certainly don't mind brainstorming in
# this direction.
That is in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00003.html
I think Nathan was exaggerating here, but maybe he knows something I don't.
- What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) David Corbin
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) Tom Christiansen
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) Nathan Wiger
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) Tom Christiansen
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) Nathan Wiger
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 1... Tom Christiansen
- Re: What's in a Regex (was R... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: What's in a Regex (w... Nathan Wiger
- Re: What's in a Regex (w... Tom Christiansen
- Re: What's in a Regex (was RFC 145) mike mulligan
