> The same goes for > > my($x, $y, @t); > > Now, you don't write > > my(x, y, t); > > do you? And yet, up to and including this very statement, the variables > are not in scope yet. Hate to just write a "useless" me too on this one, but I agree with Bart. Dropping the prefixes doesn't look like Perl at all, and is really inconsistent. And I think this: > foo( $name : $name, @addresses : @addresses, $email : $email ); is something a careful implementation can avoid, but not an argument for dropping prefixes. This ain't C, guys! ;-) -Nate
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and par... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and par... Jacob Davies
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine proto... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur