> In the meantime, is there a reason the suggestion of: > > > foo($x := 10, $y := 20) > > was dropped? It seems pretty obvious to me. Or what about: No, nothing's been dropped. I'll summarise all suggestions that don't otherwise get toasted in the next version of the RFC. A
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Andy Wardley
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine p... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and paramet... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 57 (v1) Subroutine prototypes and parameters H.Merijn Brand
