> Whoa! I'm far from convinced that I have a strong enough CS background > to understand half of what'll go on on this list. I've already > indicated on-list that I'd rather leave this position for someone else, > if there is someone else. My $.02 worth ... It's been my experience that the stronger the technical background (in anything, not just CS) the more cryptic one becomes and less able to deal on a real world level with mere mortals. I don't think 'language' needs to focus on technical 'how is it done' but more 'this is what it looks like'. I don't think having a *strong* technical background is actually a hindrance for the chair of perl6-language. Again, worth what you paid for it! Alan
