>Scalars, hashes, arrays. There's actually more than one type of plural here,
>gramatically:
> scalars hashes arrays
> singular dual plural
>(Or am I the only one left who did Ancient Greek? :)
Nope: pudge and larry, at least.
>> (and don't say, "because plural *means* more than one" :-). If having a
>> filehandle character would make the code clearer, then let's do it.
>If it would, yes. I'm not convinced that it would. But I do concede that
>people see filehandles as something conceptually different from an "ordinary"
>scalar.
What about regexes?
$foo = qr/blech/;
Should that be /foo instead? :-)
Notice how even objects use $, not something else.
--tom
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-definin... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining pun... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-definin... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... John Porter
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-def... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: Filehandle type-defining punctuation Steve Simmons
