At 08:14 AM 8/3/00 -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote:
> >True, but maybe a lower precedance keword is needed like we did
> >or || and &&. I think someone suggested "then"
>
> > print $string1, $string2, "\n" then return 3 if $cond;
>
> >then again, maybe not.
>
>Why not just piss everybody off?
>
> return 3 after print $string1, $string2 if $cond;
Shouldn't that be
cond if $string1 $string2 print 3 return;
and
>honk love forth if.
forth love? if honk then
Forth is postfix, notprefix.
>--tom
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Martyn Pearce
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Steve Fink
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Tom Christiansen
- Re: perl 6 requirements Buddha Buck
- Re: perl 6 requirements John Porter
- Re: perl 6 requirements Piers Cawley
- Re: perl 6 requirements Bart Lateur
- Re: perl 6 requirements Peter Scott
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Chaim Frenkel
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
- Re: perl 6 requirements Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: perl 6 requirements Graham Barr
