Bart Lateur wrote: > On Thu, 3 Aug 2000 10:48:17 -0400, John Porter wrote: > > OTOH, being fun (which I admit it is) is one of the reasons many > > people don't want to think Perl is a serious language. > > I don't agree. The problem is somewhere else, namely the problem that > Ilya Z. brought up: the fact that there is no complete specification for > the language. I said it's *one* of the reasons. Obviously the one you mentioned is another one. But thanks for disagreeing. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default Peter Scott
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made def... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made default skud
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made def... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... John Porter
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made def... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Tad McClellan
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC: lexical variables made... skud
- RE: RFC: lexical variables made default Sam Tregar
- RE: RFC: lexical variables made default Brust, Corwin