> Objects should have builtin string SCALAR method
>
Sorry if I'm just being dumb, but... don't we already have this by
overloading the stringifying operator q{''}? How is the proposed SCALAR
method different?
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Damian Conway
- Re: Overloading && || Dan Sugalski
- Re: Overloading && || Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Overloading && || Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin string... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builtin st... Ken Fox
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have builti... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should have bu... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 49 (v1) Objects should ha... Bart Lateur
- Jeremy Howard
