At 02:18 PM 8/2/00 +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From a language perspective, I have a scheme to allow us to yank all the
> > cruft (sockets, shm, messages, localtime...) out into separate libraries,
> > yet pull them in on demand without needing a use.
>
>a la dbmopen in perl5?
A step beyond that.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Simon Cozens
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Dan Sugalski
- Stuff in core (was Re: date ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Tim Bunce
- Re: Stuff in core (was Re: d... Piers Cawley
- Re: date interface (was Re: ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... J. David Blackstone
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Bryan C . Warnock
- Memory Footprint of Perl System Calls... mooring
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Nathan Torkington
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 require... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 req... Dan Sugalski
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirement... Damian Conway
- Re: date interface (was Re: perl6 requirements, on boo... Matt Sergeant
