On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Nathan Wiger wrote:

> However, as you point out, there's no easy way to get the HASH(addr)
> part. If this RFC is accepted, we might need a special function for that
> (but I say stick it in Data::Dumper).

Please don't worry about this. It's diving too deeply into what at this
point should rightly be opaque internal details. (As are a bunch of other
things on -language, generally speaking)

                                Dan

Reply via email to