On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 04:09:51PM -0400, Ted Ashton wrote: > Better yet, DWIM. If I write > > print "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > > and no array @southern exists, I probably mean I want it to print > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'd say, if the variable exists, interpolate it. If not, print it as > it stands. Isn't that the way perl4 did it? I don't know what agony lwall and friends went through that made them change this behaviour though. It would be good for someone who does to speak up about it. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In string @ mus... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In str... Ted Ashton
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &quo... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... John Porter
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove "In... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &quo... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or re... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or re... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove ... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 105 (v1) Downgrade or remove &quo... Kai Henningsen