punt. But, specialteam or runback?
die + raise = ascend.
</fun>
The thing I don't like about C++/Java try/catch syntax is the way
the blocks are daisychained. That is not intuitive to the flow.
The exception handlers should be more closely bound -- syntactically --
to the try block. A switch statement would be closer; but I think an
OO syntax would be better. You know, something like
try {
cough "outa here";
catch {
matawba => { sustain; },
ebola => { overrule; },
{ punt; }
}
}
--
John Porter
Aus tiefem Traum bin ich erwacht.
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchi... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 78 (v1) Improved Module Versioning And Searchi... Dan Sugalski
- errors and their keywords and where catch can return t... David L. Nicol
- Re: errors and their keywords and where catch can retu... Peter Scott
- Re: errors and their keywords and where catch can retu... Dan Sugalski
- English language basis for "throw" David L. Nicol
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Bart Lateur
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Dan Sugalski
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Nathan Torkington
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Stephen P. Potter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Tony Olekshy
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" John Porter
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Peter Scott
- Re: English language basis for "throw" Glenn Linderman
