On Tue, Aug 15, 2000 at 08:59:25PM -0700, Mark Cogan wrote: > At 11:43 PM 8/15/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: > >Counter example: @a = \($a, $b, $c); > > I guess I'm missing the point; how is this different from > > @a = [$a,$b,$c]; Well, I've lost the point of this thread, but @a = \($a, $b, $c); is equivalent to @a = (\$a, \$b, \$c); rather than what you wrote. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking John Porter
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Nathan Torkington
- Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC 104 (v1... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re: RFC... Nathan Torkington
- Re: Component wise || and RFC 82 (was Re:... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Uses for array notation (was Re: RFC ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Mark Cogan
- Array notation (was Re: RFC 104 (v1) ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 82 (scalar ops consistent in list... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 104 (v1) Backtracking David L. Nicol