John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Huh? They need to be "globals", because the "with" mechanism > is going to have to be able to write them into a symbol table. > You can't do this with lexicals. Yes, you can. For an approach like this, the hash needs to be a pseudo-hash anyway. -- Johan
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: Default filehandles(was Re: command line option: $... Peter Scott
- pascal-like "with" was Re: Default filehand... David L. Nicol
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... John Porter
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Johan Vromans
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default file... Dave Storrs
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Clayton Scott
- Re: pascal-like "with" was Re: Default fileh... Dave Storrs
- implied pascal-like "with" or "express&... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jeremy Howard
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... David L. Nicol
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Dave Storrs
- Re: implied pascal-like "with" or "expr... Brian Wheeler