Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators

[Glenn Linderman]

Yes, these all sound useful!  Damian, could you make sure they get included
in your switch statement?

And don't forget

        =:=

which should compare lazy, infinite sublists, as in

   if ( 4..:2 =:= 2 * ( 2.. )) { ... }

Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:

> I want four special new comparison operators.
>         " e q "    "/ "

>         Eq,
>
>  I will possibly
> also want Cmp which will sort "foo200" before "foo1000".
>
>         ==/R
>         eq/multinlingual

--
Glenn
=====
There  are two kinds of people, those
who finish  what they start,  and  so
on...                 -- Robert Byrne



____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
Download Now     http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
Request a CDROM  1-800-333-3633
___________________________________________________________