Yes, these all sound useful! Damian, could you make sure they get included in your switch statement? And don't forget =:= which should compare lazy, infinite sublists, as in if ( 4..:2 =:= 2 * ( 2.. )) { ... } Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > I want four special new comparison operators. > " e q " "/ " > Eq, > > I will possibly > also want Cmp which will sort "foo200" before "foo1000". > > ==/R > eq/multinlingual -- Glenn ===== There are two kinds of people, those who finish what they start, and so on... -- Robert Byrne ____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________ Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633 ___________________________________________________________
- Upscope (was Re: RFC 143) John Porter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp o... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp o... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and c... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Jarkko Hietaniemi
- infix functions Glenn Linderman
- infix functions David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Markus Peter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp opera... John Porter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators John Porter
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 143 (v1) Case ignoring eq and cmp operators Steve Simmons