On Fri, 25 Aug 2000 07:47:14 -0400, Stephen P. Potter wrote:
>| Do we have an RFC yet that proposes Perl to be easier parsable?
>
>Great idea. I'd love to see us come up with some "meta" RFCs which say
>what the main goals of perl6 are. Then we could align the current RFCs
>with those meta RFCs to make sure we're meeting those goals.
I propose that one of the main goals should be that perl6 ought to be
bugfree.
Feasable? Nah...
--
Bart.
- RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even with ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, e... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matche... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explici... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require exp... Carl Johan Berglund
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explici... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require exp... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Nathan Torkington
