On Mon 28 Aug, Eric Roode wrote: > Richard Proctor proposed: > > > > All of these should work: > > > > print <<EOL; > >EOL > > print << EOL; > > EOL > > print <<EOL ; > >EOL # this is the end of the here doc > > People may throw rocks at me for this, but I'd like to suggest that > not only is a comment allowed on the terminator line, but a semicolon > also be allowed. Vis: > > print <<EOL; > EOL; # This should work, too > > Yes, I know that it can be done as: > > print <<"EOL;"; > EOL; > > but (imho) the prior example has high DWIM value, and is keeping with > the spirit of the RFC. I like it... I think I will add this to the next version. Richard -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace an... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespa... Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace an... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespace an... Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespa... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whit... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was ... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whit... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whitespa... Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 111 (v2) Here Docs Terminators (Was Whit... David L. Nicol