On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 04:53:46PM -0400, Bryan C . Warnock wrote:
>On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Michael Maraist wrote:
>
>> Good idea, but you have it backwards.. If anything, there should be an
>> "explicit" keyword..
>> Remember, we want
>> 
>> %  perl -p -e 's/foo/bar/g' file.txt
>
>Oh, I know.  I threw it in because someone mentioned wanting to turn it
>off.  (There may have been some confusion in the default settings.  The
>implicit arg would be 'on' by default.  To turn it off would require:
>
>no implict arg;
>
>Use could then turn it back on again.)

Oh, that's just odd. 

It would make much more sense to have "use explicit" to turn it on when
you wanted it.

K.

-- 
Kirrily Robert -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://netizen.com.au/
Open Source development, consulting and solutions
Level 10, 500 Collins St, Melbourne VIC 3000
Phone: +61 3 9614 0949  Fax: +61 3 9614 0948  Mobile: +61 410 664 994

Reply via email to