Graham Barr wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:55:28PM +1100, Damian Conway wrote: > > And has anyone pointed out that C<list> is just: > > > > sub list {@_} > > Um no. I would expect it to be > > sub list { @_[0..$#_] } According to my quickie tests, both have the desired effect (supplying list context to the argument expression). -- John Porter We're building the house of the future together.
- RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to force list c... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to for... skud
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to for... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... John Porter
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keyword to... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> keywor... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Steve Fink
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list> ke... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 175 (v1) Add C<list&g... Tom Christiansen