Bart Lateur wrote: > > If you say > > keys %hash = 200; > > then `%hash' will have at least 200 buckets allocated for > it--256 of them, in fact, since it rounds up to the next power > of two. This should go away, of course. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipu... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to m... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- proto-RFC: keys(HASH) as lvalue (was Re: RF... John Porter
- Re: proto-RFC: keys(HASH) as lvalue (was Re:... Tom Christiansen
- Re: proto-RFC: keys(HASH) as lvalue (was Re... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... John Porter
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Gael Pegliasco
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set the... Tom Christiansen