"David L. Nicol" wrote:
>
> No, that would be
>
> dog $spot;
No, it wouldn't:
$r = new CGI; # CGI->new
See?
> You can have your general consensus, I'm not in his army.
Well, unfortunately I think you're doomed to fail then. You're forcing
constraints on yourself that Perl cannot fulfill, and which I can't see
Larry approving.
I really don't want to argue about this trivial point anymore. my($.02)
is that your ideas are great, but if you want any realistic chance of
getting them into Perl 6, then you have to make the syntax look like
Perl.
-Nate
- the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT David Corbin
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Sam Tregar
- RE: the C JIT David Olbersen
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- Re: the C JIT David L. Nicol
- Re: the C JIT Nathan Wiger
- we already have barewords as ... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords... John Porter
- Re: we already have barewords... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords... David L. Nicol
- Re: we already have barewords... John Porter
- Re: the C JIT Sam Tregar
