Re: RFC 179 (v1) More functions from set theory to manipulate arrays

[Chaim Frenkel]

>>>>> "TC" == Tom Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> Basically a hash with
>> only the keys, no other baggage.

TC> If you don't want but the keys, don't use but the keys.

Does that mean, that none of the other bookeeping for the values will
be done?

Is this "@hash{@keys};" valid?

Would it be possible to make push(%hash, @keys) work? Doesn't look likely
is @keys the keys, the values, or both?

<chaim>
-- 
Chaim Frenkel                                        Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                               +1-718-236-0183