Tim Conrow wrote:
> 
> Tom Christiansen wrote:
> > Perhaps what you're truly looking for is a generalized tainting mechanism.
> 
> Sounds cool, but I have only the vaguest idea what you (may) mean. Pointers?
> RFCs? Examples? Hints?

Sorry for the clutter, but I didn't want to come off too clueless. I know what
tainting is, I just don't know what you mean by generalized tainting. If it's
been discussed before I'd love to see a pointer to the thread.

--

-- Tim Conrow         [EMAIL PROTECTED]                           |

Reply via email to