Tim Conrow wrote: > > Tom Christiansen wrote: > > Perhaps what you're truly looking for is a generalized tainting mechanism. > > Sounds cool, but I have only the vaguest idea what you (may) mean. Pointers? > RFCs? Examples? Hints? Sorry for the clutter, but I didn't want to come off too clueless. I know what tainting is, I just don't know what you mean by generalized tainting. If it's been discussed before I'd love to see a pointer to the thread. -- -- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data from print... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary da... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binar... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed b... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish pac... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Disting... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Disting... Tom Christiansen
- Generalized (taint-like)... John Porter
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary da... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Eric Roode