Graham Barr wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 04:06:00PM -0600, Tom Christiansen wrote: > > Why not just check @numbers? > > Well if the 'use trisate' pragma ever arises (did anyone RFC that ?) Following Glenn's lead, I'm in the process of RFC'ing a new null() keyword and value that will do this: $a = 1; $b = null; $c = $a + $b; $c is null, not 1. Since undef() has established semantics, I don't think these should change. I believe taking from RDBMS and adding null() which has the correct NULL semantics is the way it should go. One thing I'll add is the posibility to decide whether you want your variables initialized to undef() or null(): use initialize 'null'; Or something like that. Easy integration of DBI here we come... (hopefully) :-) -Nate
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce iain truskett
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce John Porter
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce John Porter
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: redu... John Porter
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 76 (v2) Builtin: reduce Nathan Wiger