On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 04:20:37 -0400 (EDT), Philip Newton wrote:
>On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Tom Christiansen wrote:
>
>> =item perl6storm #0035
>>
>> Make A->B place A in string context, like => does.
>> That way no A()->B naughtiness.
>
>While still allowing explicit A()->B?
Of course. You can still have
A() => 'B'
too, can't you? The rules would be the same.
--
Bart.
- PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6 Tom Christiansen
- Re: PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6 Tom Christiansen
- "0", true or false? (was: PERL6STORM #0052... Bart Lateur
- Re: "0", true or false? (was: PERL6STO... David L. Nicol
- Re: "0", true or false? (was: PERL... Nathan Wiger
- auto-flock on file open (was: PERL6STORM - #0031) Bart Lateur
- perl6storm #0010: kill all defaults Philip Newton
- perl6storm #0011: interactive perl mode Philip Newton
- Re: perl6storm #0011: interactive perl mode Russ Allbery
- Re: PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6 Philip Newton
- perl6storm #0050 Bart Lateur
- perl6storm #0050 Philip Newton
- Re: perl6storm #0050 raptor
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Dave Storrs
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Johan Vromans
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Simon Cozens
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Robert Mathews
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Simon Cozens
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Piers Cawley
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Simon Cozens
