John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Piers Cawley wrote: > > > > You know, I'm trying to see what's annoying about all those > > parentheses in the lisp function and what do you know, I can't see > > anything wrong. Okay, so it's not Perl syntax, but it's still clear > > what's going on. > > Yes, but it's hard to read. We could argue this back and forth, but I don't think that was hard to read. Sure you need to know lisp to understand it, but the same could be said of *any* programming language. -- Piers
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Simon Cozens
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Piers Cawley
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Simon Cozens
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Piers Cawley
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Simon Cozens
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Buddha Buck
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Piers Cawley
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Philip Newton
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Johan Vromans
- Re: perl6storm #0050 Philip Newton
- Re: perl6storm #0050 iain truskett
- Re: perl6storm #0050 John Porter
- perl6storm #0060: formats Philip Newton
- perl6storm #0073 Philip Newton
- RE: PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6 Fisher Mark
- RE: PERL6STORM - tchrist's brainstorm list for perl6 Dan Sugalski