At 10:59 03/10/2000 -0400, John Porter wrote: >Complex things should not be done in POD. Indeed. This debate has been done to death. Have any of the would-be pod-killers read the thread at http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/1999-08/thrd11.html#0 1078 ? The thread eventually died out, and for good reason imho. -- robin b. Don't panic.
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... John Barnette
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docum... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for d... John Barnette
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docum... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for d... Robin Berjon
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for d... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Philip Newton
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel