From: Peter Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > As I said earlier, why don't we just define a syntax for > *anything* to be used as an extension language, and let > the, er, market decide? Here, here! Peaceful coexistance... what a concept.
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for d... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use ... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Adam Turoff
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Philip Newton
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Myers, Dirk
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... Garrett Goebel
- RE: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inst... David Grove
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documenta... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docum... Johan Vromans