From: Garrett Goebel
>
> This just in "Damian Conway writes":
> > the RFC has a glaring mistake: derived pre-conditions are
> > supposed to be tested *before*, not after inherited ones!)
Hmm. Would it still skip performing the inherited pre handlers if the
derived pre was satisfied? That is nice for Design-By-Contract... but what
of Jarkko's RFC 194: Standardise Function Pre- and Post-Handling
(http://dev.perl.org/rfc/194.html)?
Wouldn't you want all the pre-handlers invoked all the way up? Even if you
don't care about the results of those pre's which are conditions?
Garrett
