On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:04:46PM +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: > > It doesn't have to be like that. Functions that are not in the core can > > still be automatically loaded, but only if your code actually uses them. > > That could make the perl kernel a lot smaller than it is now, and > > hopefully, make it load faster. > > I agree > > dbmopen() already loads AnyDBM_File to do the real work without the > user (or script) knowing, so this idea could be extended. What an excellent idea. http://dev.perl.org/rfc/315.html -- Testing can show the presense of bugs, but not their absence. -- Dijkstra
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nicholas Clark
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Branden
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Casey R. Tweten
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur