Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Also, the vast majority of perl variables have no finalization
> > attached to them.
>
> That's true, but without static typing don't you have to treat them as if
> they did? At the very least you need to do a "is it an object with a
> DESTROY" check at block boundaries.
>
Only because the type is static, I don't think they wouldn't be references.
my $foo = new Baz();
{
my Baz $bar = $foo;
};
# DESTROY should be called on the object ref'd by $bar ?
# It's still ref'd on $foo !!!
- Branden
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Ken Fox
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Sam Tregar
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Sam Tregar
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Sam Tregar
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Piers Cawley
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
