On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 05:33:05PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> package foo;
> use attrs qw(cleanup_sub);
>
> would be nice, but I don't know that he'll go for it. (Though it's the only
> way I can think of to avoid AUTOLOAD being considered a potential destructor)
Fiat?
It's pretty hard (for me) to think of when you'd want an AUTOLOADed DESTROY,
since if you create /any/ objects of the class, DESTROY will be called.
"It isn't possible to AUTOLOAD DESTROY." --perlmem(6)
-=- James Mastros
--
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a
safe place."
AIM: theorbtwo homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Piers Cawley
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) John Porter
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/) David Mitchell
