[ date ] 2001/03/30 | Friday | 11:16 PM
[ author ] John Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Russ Allbery wrote:
> > gcc and the literature both use "pure"; I'd recommend that.
John Porter wrote:
> I like pure too, but I'm afraid the nuance of it will be
> completely lost on non-Functional programmers.
not to worry... If anything, it might educate them. I
didn't really grok functional programming before I got
to experiment w/ some functional idioms in a perl context.
I also like "pure" for its great potential in perl poetry. ;-)
my $cents = 2;
