> And what would be a better way of testing this out than being able to > make perl6 parse and run perl5 code correctly? (and I think that a key component > ways of making this workable would be to promote a descendent of > Parse::RecDescent to be the mechanism that parses perl for *real* and is the > basis of micro-perl, etc.) Regardless of the implementation, you are right on. It would be such an enjoyable thing to have a standard "Perl 5.x" lib of meta-syntax definitions that could serve as both parser logic and function mappings. The day you can execute a Perl5 test script successfully within that framework is a cool, cool day.
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Wiger
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dave Storrs
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Edward Peschko
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Glenn Linderman
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ted Ashton
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Garrett Goebel
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Michael G Schwern
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp