On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 01:33:22PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > > I'd really rather not, and I don't think that was Larry's intention. I > > think rather it was "perl 5 warning/strict levels", not "parse as perl 5 > > code". At least I hope that's the case... > well, personally I would rather that this *is* done, because it forces perl > 6's architecture to be solid. Only as solid as Perl 5's. And remember we're throwing that one away. :) -- By God I *KNOW* what this network is for, and you can't have it. - Russ Allbery, http://www.slacker.com/rant.html
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Edward Peschko
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Piers Cawley
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Johan Vromans
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Siracusa