On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 02:36:40PM -0400, John Porter wrote:
> I balk at the proposition of Yet Another Namespace.
Where?
> > It also means that every operator has a function name,
>
> I would think that would be the case, regardless of the
> form the general operator syntax takes.
And functions have attributes, so no new namespace.
--
DESPAIR:
It's Always Darkest Just Before it Gets Pitch Black
http://www.despair.com
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Paul Johnson
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Andy Dougherty
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Larry Wall
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Siracusa
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Kirrily Robert
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Graham Barr
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
