On Fri 06 Apr, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> This is, I presume, in addition to any sort of inherent DWIMmery? I don't
> see any reason that:
>
> @foo[1,2] = <STDIN>;
>
> shouldn't read just two lines from that filehandle, for example, nor why
>
Fair enough
> @bar = @foo * 12;
>
> shouldn't assign to @bar all the elements of @foo multiplied by 12. (Though
> others might, of course)
Reasonable, but what should
@bar = @foo x 2;
do? Repeat @foo twice or repeat each element twice? (its current behaviour
is less than useless, other than for JAPHs)
Richard
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Adam Turoff
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 nick
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Richard Proctor
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 nick
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Brian
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Richard Proctor
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 James Mastros
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
