"David Whipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > One-liners run on a Perl 6 binary should just be Perl 6 code. Do we > > really have to worry about backwards compatibility with one liners? > > > > Hmm... programs that have perl one-liners inside them might be > > troublesome. > > > Why not: > > perl -e 'perl 5 one-liner' > > perl --cmd 'perl 6 one-liner' > > i.e. maintain the "-e" switch as a backward compatibility flag, with a new > cmd line flag for perl 6. One liners are supposed to be SHORT. `--cmd' is LONG. If we MUST go the multiflagged way, why not reflect `-e' to get the `-6' flag? At the very least, I want a short flag! -- Ariel Scolnicov
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Brent Dax
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Whipp
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Jeremy Howard
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Greg Boug
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Russ Allbery
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Ariel Scolnicov
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 David Grove
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- RE: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Nathan Torkington
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 John Porter
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Simon Cozens
- Re: Larry's Apocalypse 1 Dan Sugalski