Re: apo 2

[Dave Storrs]

On Tue, 8 May 2001, Me wrote:

> yes?
> 
> And, despite perl5's use of no as the opposite
> of use, and given that there may be no use in
> perl6 (;>), and thus perhaps no no, (on and off?),
> then maybe no could be used as not yes?
> 
> no?


        Your Honor, I would like to stipulate that that sentence be taken
out and shot. ;>

                Dave