On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 12:46:52PM -0400, John Porter wrote: > Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Prototypes don't work on methods. And I wouldn't hold them up as > > being anything but a mediocre hack. Its not really type checking. > > It's not just prototypes. > > % perl -e '$r=\%h; print @$r' > Not an ARRAY reference at -e line 1. This isn't type-checking (semantical arguments > /dev/null), its more like basic syntax. You don't want to try holding up prototypes and dereference checks to Java's typing system and try to claim its in the same league, or even the same sport. -- Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One It sure is fun masturbating. http://www.unamerican.com/
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Dan Brian
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Piers Cawley
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Peter Scott
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture Garrett Goebel
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- Re: Properties and stricture Michael G Schwern
- RE: Properties and stricture David Whipp
- Re: Properties and stricture Daniel S. Wilkerson
- Re: Properties and stricture John Porter