> In summary: > > 1. I don't like ~ for concat > > 2. But if it does become concat, then we still > shouldn't > change ~'s current unary meaning > > > Thanks for listening. > > -Nate I agree completely. However, this is no longer really a topic for -internals, it's really a purely language thing. -- BKS __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
- ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulator) Nathan Wiger
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... James Mastros
- Re: stealing something from plan9 os Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Simon Cozens
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Bart Lateur
- RE: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... David Grove
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Russ Allbery
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emulato... Benjamin Stuhl
- Re: ~ for concat / negation (Re: The Perl 6 Emu... Dan Sugalski