Buddha Buck wrote:
> True, agreed, and admitted. So why can't a general purpose programming
> language be designed with XML-based syntax? Why can't a general-purpose
> programming language be augmented with XML for internal documentation purposes?
Maybe the gcc back end could accept this new XML p-code.
--
David Nicol 816.235.1187
Series EE bonds can be exchanged for Series HH savings bonds.
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Dan Brian
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Austin Hastings
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Sam Tregar
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Buddha Buck
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html David L. Nicol
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Adam Turoff
- Re: http://www.ora.com/news/vhll_1299.html Buddha Buck
