At 10:17 PM 9/3/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Monday 03 September 2001 09:30 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > A clever idea, and one I'd not though of. That's probably the best way to
> > do it. Has some other issues, like do we allow prototypes like:
> >
> > sub foo ($$) {};
> >
> > to be called as:
> >
> > foo(@bar)
> >
> > if @bar has two elements in it?
>
>To me, that seems only a language decision. This could certainly handle
>that.
Ah, but calling in the first way has two PMCs in as parameters, while the
second has only one. Potentially at least. A world of difference there.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
