Re: What's up with %MY?

[Dan Sugalski]

At 12:13 AM 9/7/2001 -0400, Ken Fox wrote:
>Damian Conway wrote:
> > "3, 1, 3" is the correct answer.
>
>That's what I thought. Dan's not going to be happy. ;)

Well, it means a fetch by pad entry rather than use of a cached PMC 
pointer, but that's OK by me.

I have a solution for this that I'm perfectly comfortable with, so I'm 
fine. Once we've worked out how things should behave, then we can get on 
with implementing it.

                                        Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                         have teddy bears and even
                                      teddy bears get drunk