At 12:13 AM 9/7/2001 -0400, Ken Fox wrote: >Damian Conway wrote: > > "3, 1, 3" is the correct answer. > >That's what I thought. Dan's not going to be happy. ;) Well, it means a fetch by pad entry rather than use of a cached PMC pointer, but that's OK by me. I have a solution for this that I'm perfectly comfortable with, so I'm fine. Once we've worked out how things should behave, then we can get on with implementing it. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Ken Fox
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: What's up with %MY? Garrett Goebel
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Damian Conway
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Ken Fox
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski
- Re: What's up with %MY? Ken Fox
- Re: What's up with %MY? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dave Mitchell
- Re: What's up with %MY? David L. Nicol
- Re: What's up with %MY? Dan Sugalski