Allison Randal wrote: > Hmmm... some discussion generated on this subject, but fairly light. I > take that as an indicator that an C<else> on loops is a fairly popular > idea. The other possibilities are that b) people don't want any form of > "else" on loops and aren't saying so or c) people simply don't care, > but silence and apathy just don't seem to be vices we're afflicted with > in this community. ;)
I actually like Andy Wardly's suggestion of iterators. It makes a lot of sense and looks a lot cleaner to read and write and adds less new syntax to remember (and parse). Clayton
