> sub hidden (str $name, int $force is aka($override)) > { ... }
I know that the property syntax is pseudo established, but I'm beggining to become a bit jaded about all the built in properties were building. What about good ol' aliases? sub hidden (str $name, int $force := $override) { . . .} While less verbose, it's actually more legible to me, in that the prototype (we still calling it that?) get's less visual clutter. In a related note, even if the 'is aka($am, $are, $also_known_as) = 'Electric Mayhem')' syntax get's establsihed will the alising trick still work? Or are we stepping on the Perl 6 rule against leaking lexical scopes? -Erik Is your boss reading your email? ....Probably Keep your messages private by using Lycos Mail. Sign up today at http://mail.lycos.com