Trey Harris wrote: > A more practical application would be: > > my $foo; > # Code which might or might not set $foo... > $foo //= 23; > # or > $foo is default(23); > > In such a case, the C<is default> just looks plain odd to me.
It is. More than that, it's plain wrong. C<is> properties are compile-time features. They can only be specified on declarations. > Weird. C<//=> seems perfectly reasonable to me. To us too. That's why we chose them for parameter defaulting as well. Damian
